PNFL

This proposal addresses a long-standing concern about the limited performance gap between top players and mid-range or lower-tier players, while avoiding permanent changes that could negatively affect incoming rookies. The recommended adjustment to substitution percentages is reversible without any...

We would need players to come back in less than 100% to achieve the result we are seeking, so the IN% should not be 100%. Considering QBs currently have a 75% OUT and an 80% IN, they already tell us what we really should aim for. Our QBs rarely get subbed and come back even when they are shaken (wh...

I could see this really have an impact on the T-Lob plays. I’m against this. Im definitely not in favor of lower EN AND forced sub percentages. We need a way to mitigate and counterbalance the change. So, we can’t add plays that are clones of other plays with different personnel, so we can’t handle...

IN and DI are never affected by the substitution % because they are not influenced by EN, so it won't lead to more mistakes. Will lead to lower ST, lower SP and AG, etc. which will lead to mistakes such as mistackles and getting outmaneuvered. Well, I will see if I can test your assertion! I do kno...

This is a very productive discussion. In keeping with our usual incremental approach to change, I recommend lowering the IN/OUT threshold as the least disruptive option and the easiest to reverse if it does not produce the desired results. Substitution Percent – With the exception of the QB, who wi...

2048 Week #10 Winners and Losers! Selected Offensive Plays of the Week: Runs: MN28RMm (RM) = 5 attempts; 63 yards for 12.6 yards per carry. - No Fumbles DN28RMX3 (RM) = 4 attempts; 34 yards for 8.5 yards per carry. - No Fumbles NY22RM00 (RM) = 4 attempts; 28 yards for 7.0 yards per carry. - No Fumb...